About Ovivo

Put a person's entire health history in their hands.

Secure, smart and shareable, so they can understand their care, control their data, and help shape a healthier future. Lifelong ownership, held securely and ethically, on a platform that unifies records, makes sense of them, and lets people benefit from their own data rather than simply being the source of it.

In vivo, not in vitro.

What we are building

Seven products, one connected system.

Designed as one system with the person's own record at the centre, and built in an order chosen on purpose, so the parts carrying no personal data ship first.

Going to market

MASIE

Universities, research hospitals, guideline bodies

Medical evidence changes constantly and no one can read all of it. A governed team of AI agents reads, debates and integrity-checks the biomedical literature continuously, scoring every paper for quality before it can be debated at all, and promoting a conclusion to trusted only after a governed vote that is logged and auditable. It runs on published literature and consented, de-identified data. No personal health records are involved, which is exactly why it can go first.

Next

Ovivo Guidelines

Guideline councils and committees

Clinical guidelines that stay current. When the underlying evidence moves, Ovivo drafts the proposed update and the committee that owns the guideline decides whether to adopt it. A reconciliation layer continuously flags each guideline as concordant with current evidence, discordant with it, or sitting in a gap. Still no patient data.

Later, regulated

Ovivo Protocol

Clinicians

Care built for one person rather than for the average patient, drawn from the intersection of their record, current evidence and current guidelines, and recomputed whenever any of the three changes. This is the part of the system that is squarely regulated as software in a medical device, so it is preceded by clinical validation and it always ends with a clinician's signature.

The heart of it

Ovivo Record

People, and their families

The lifelong health record held by the person it describes, birth to death. It is the data origin the whole platform exists to serve, and because it holds identifiable data it is fully walled off from everything else. Separate deployment, separate region, its own certifications. It contributes to the rest only as tokenised, consent-gated signal.

Ecosystem

Apps on Prescription

Digital therapeutics developers

Certified health apps a doctor can actually prescribe, which work with an existing record rather than starting from nothing. Developers integrate once for consent, real-world evidence and reporting instead of building the same integration market by market.

Later, ethics gated

Ovivo Trials

Research institutions

Making it possible to take part in research from where you are, turning a consented network into a generator of randomised evidence rather than only an observational one. No code in this layer ships until an independent international ethics board and a data safety monitoring board are constituted and first-jurisdiction approval is secured.

The seventh: a Federated Health Commons

Health data should not be locked inside any one company's product, including ours. The Federated Health Commons is an open standard for how citizen-held health records work, so records can move between systems by design. We intend to give it away, because infrastructure this important should not be owned by whoever built it first.

What would count as working

Six things we are trying to change.

  • Reduce demand on healthcare services, and improve access to them.
  • Relieve staff who are carrying an administrative load they did not train for.
  • Improve outcomes through care built for one person rather than an average.
  • Improve health equity, because a portable record helps most the people who move most.
  • Curate and optimise medications safely, where more than half of errors happen at transitions of care.
  • Redefine what it feels like to be a patient inside a system of many systems.
Rules we have set ourselves

The lines we will not cross to move faster.

Ovivo proposes, humans decide

Evidence can be surfaced, scored and drafted automatically. Committees still ratify guideline changes, and clinicians still make treatment decisions. This is a governance rule applied to every product, not a caveat attached to some of them.

Provenance, always

Every conclusion carries how certain it is, how settled the field is, where experts disagree, and which studies it rests on. A confident answer with no provenance is worse than a hedged one with provenance.

The safe parts ship first

The products that carry no personal data and make no clinical directive ship first. It would be faster to do it the other way round. It would also be the wrong order for something people have to trust with their health history.

Portability over lock-in

Open health data standards, a full export and a real deletion path. If someone can leave easily, staying means something. The protocol layer we are designing is intended to be given away for the same reason.

Say what is not built

Where a claim describes a design rather than an audited system, we say so. Where a date is not known, we do not invent one. This costs us some polish and we would rather pay it.

Contact

How to reach us.

Everything goes to one address. Say which of these you are and it gets to the right person faster.

Clinicians and practices

You want to know when it opens, or you want to be among the first practices using it. Tell us your discipline and roughly how you work, it changes what we build next.

Researchers and guideline bodies

The evidence engine is the part that is going to market now. It has its own site and its own front door at masie.one.

Health organisations

Procurement, security review, data residency, integration. Ask for the current position in detail rather than in summary and we will send it.

Investors

We would rather send you the material than talk around it. Say what stage of diligence you are at.

Journalists

Happy to talk, including about the parts that are not finished. We will tell you what is designed and what is running.

Security researchers

If you have found something, write to us and we will route it quickly. A formal disclosure programme is a condition of opening the record tier, and it is not done yet.